Exotr iotiotroirto

Autonomous Radical Democracy (Dotp)/Anarcho Syndicalism (vanguard) fused with a Podemos (Spain) type of vanguard party (vanguard)

Use an autonomist Radical Democracy as an alternative Dotp with a focus on the community. The community would be the pure constituted power and would resemble a plural multitude (of people) instead of the working class in traditional Marxism.

This plural multitude would be the pure constituted power and would reclaim this power by searching and creating mutual understandings within the community during this phase. 

This strand of radical democracy would challenge the traditional thinking about equality and freedom in liberal democracies by making individual equality to be found in the singularities within the multitude, where equality overall would be created by an all inclusive multitude and freedom which would be created by restoring the multitude in its pure constituted power.

Under this autonomous Radical Democracy alternate DotP there would be an Anarcho Syndicalism type vanguard adjacent that would have some elements of this type of vanguard. 

Eventually this Radical Democracy alternate DoTP would shift to this 'Anarcho Liberal' DoTP as we shift to the below Anarcho Syndicalism vanguard adjacent

This Anarcho Syndicalism type vanguard adjacent would be collectives or affinity groups (like Black Army, CNT-FAI etc),  that include Anarcho syndicalists who would use these methods in addition to traditional vanguard party methods as mentioned here.  

This set up would include high degrees of community autonomy (in accordance with certain global principles), at least compared to a traditional vanguard

This syndicalism vanguard adjacent model would reject bourgeois values, Liberalism 2.0, revisionist Marxism/Leninism 4.0 and it promotes heroism, vitalism, direct action,  anti plutocratic ,productive, interventionalist, and the willingness to fight. It would make labor become joyful and prideful, a title to being empowered

This would build and reorganize political structures through class struggle while preserving class consciousness. It would help unite the State and labor, and unite economic classes into a program of national development and growth. 

There would be a post statist, and elements from Canadian and Australian democracy in this Anarcho Syndicalism dotp model

This vanguard would also be made up of whoever is thrown into opposition to the establishment at the time (cross-class feminist movements, the LGBT community, environmentalists, the unemployed, see here) and not be based on the working class . 

It would basically be compromised of outsiders who band together in their individualistic struggle against society and in pursuance of their own curiosity, pride, and instinct against society. This is a needed increasing of political hegemony of citizens who don’t have a lot of influence or political voice

This reflects my views that women, immigrants, BIPOC people (including Indigenous communities), LGTBQ+ people, and other diverse groups should not only recognized, but be championed as key protagonists in the growing calls for social, economic, and political reform.  

Then after we achieve this we can use this type of civic nationalism and or this and this type of Cultural Nationalism to reign in a Bolshevik-inspired type of governance, including a state socialist economy which includes a strong centralized state (as a final goal) along with Bill Maher type of Western values traditionalism

This society would contain new traditions (next wave), new values and new theology while countering and fighting against worldly sophistication .  maybe Americans would rediscover Pre postmodernity that would be understood not as the past, but as the a-temporal structure of principles and values. Sort of like in religion God/Trinity always existed, exists now and will always exist.

This new world would be skeptical of the idea of progress (including that progress of history leads to liberty and enlightenment) which is the idea that the current order of things is the result of an ongoing improvement process that we can take further, possibly even to its apotheosis, if we put in the effort.

This world would see our current trajectory, which the rulers and their loyal reformist and “revolutionary” opposition label “progress”,  as inherently harmful to individual freedom, free association, healthy relations, the totality of life and even Earth itself. Postmodernity’s biggest weakness is decadence

This world would bring this trajectory to an end so that new ways of living and relating would be developed if we are to achieve full autonomy and freedom. This would not necessarily lead to absolutely rejecting technology and civilization, nor would this rejection constitute the bottom line of a break with the Left.

However this partial rejection of some aspects of progress definitely would mean a willingness to seriously and critically analyze and question civilization and technology, and in particular industrialism.  Basically it would not be conservative/traditional since history doesn't repeat (it would take faith to embrace this sort of futurism) 

This a-temporal structure of principles and values would belong to the different philosophical Universe (where exist Eternity, God, angels, souls, devil, end of time and resurrection of dead).  Filter this through my complex and personal spiritual beliefs

The concept of past (as as something that does not exist any more) with pejorative connotation is essentially a pre postmodern/non western political modernity concept that is based in its turn on the dimension negation of Eternity and time absolutization of the time (like becoming). 

Pre postmodernity/non western political modernity is not the past. The Pre-postmodernity is society, culture, political system etc that might be constructed on the fundamental belief in the Eternity. 

The postmodernity denies that , thus its chrono-centric epistemology.  In the context of postmodernity we are dealing with the subject of Cartesian. Its true normative interpretation is a liberal one --the individual. So we might deconstruct this concept of individual making appeal to the pre-postmodernity/non western political modernity understanding of human being and its essence.

Pre postmodernity/non western political modernity would be a society based on the natural-rights philosophy that informed or was expressed in the moral codes (like the DOI)

This society would be based on eternal and permanent principle of justice rooted in the nature of things, accessible in principle by reason to humans in all places and at all times with self-evident truths that would be rooted in the laws of mother nature

There would be a common ground of nature and reason, on which all humans could debate with one another in moral terms everyone would understand. This would be based on rational persuasion 

This Pre postmodernity/non western political modernity society would look back and draw on our history to move forward.